Skip to main content
added 44 characters in body
Source Link

You're doing fine; I'm not seeing any widespread problemsproblems; At this point, I think you are doing fine . Unless someone wants claim otherwise, I would try to avoid broad, hypothetical policy discussions unless something very specific becomes a problem in actual practice.

The goal is to create a diverse, comprehensive site. YouUnfortunately, you can't really "policy" a site into expertise if the community is not there. This site is barely one day old. If, but if you aren't seeing the types of questions that would intrigue folks in this space, you can balance that out by inviting like-minded colleaguesinviting like-minded colleagues who would likely have the types of questions you would like to see asked on this site.

Just a tip from your friendly neighborhood Community Manager.

You're doing fine; I'm not seeing any widespread problems. Unless someone wants claim otherwise, I would try to avoid broad, hypothetical policy discussions unless something very specific becomes a problem in actual practice.

The goal is to create a diverse, comprehensive site. You can't really "policy" a site into expertise if the community is not there. This site is barely one day old. If you aren't seeing the types of questions that would intrigue folks in this space, you can balance that out by inviting like-minded colleagues who would likely have the types of questions you would like to see asked on this site.

Just a tip from your friendly neighborhood Community Manager.

I'm not seeing any widespread problems; At this point, I think you are doing fine . Unless someone wants claim otherwise, I would try to avoid broad, hypothetical policy discussions unless something very specific becomes a problem in actual practice.

The goal is to create a diverse, comprehensive site. Unfortunately, you can't really "policy" a site into expertise if the community is not there. This site is barely one day old, but if you aren't seeing the types of questions that would intrigue folks in this space, you can balance that out by inviting like-minded colleagues who would likely have the types of questions you would like to see asked on this site.

Just a tip from your friendly neighborhood Community Manager.

edited body
Source Link

You're doing fine; I'm not seeing any widespread problems.

  Unless someone wants claim otherwise, I would try to avoid broad, hypothetical policy discussions unless something very specific becomes a problem in actual practice.

The goal is to create a diverse, comprehensive site. This site is barely one day old. You can't really "policy" a site into expertise if the community is not there. This site is barely one day old. If you aren't seeing the types of questions that would intrigue folks in this space, you can balance out that out by inviting like-minded colleagues who would likely have the types of questions you would like to see asked on this site.

Just a tip from your friendly neighborhood Community Manager.

You're doing fine; I'm not seeing any widespread problems.

  Unless someone wants claim otherwise, I would try to avoid broad, hypothetical policy discussions unless something very specific becomes a problem in actual practice.

The goal is to create a diverse, comprehensive site. This site is barely one day old. You can't "policy" a site into expertise. If you aren't seeing the types of questions that would intrigue folks in this space, you can balance out that by inviting like-minded colleagues who would likely have the types of questions you would like to see asked on this site.

Just a tip from your friendly neighborhood Community Manager.

You're doing fine; I'm not seeing any widespread problems. Unless someone wants claim otherwise, I would try to avoid broad, hypothetical policy discussions unless something very specific becomes a problem in actual practice.

The goal is to create a diverse, comprehensive site. You can't really "policy" a site into expertise if the community is not there. This site is barely one day old. If you aren't seeing the types of questions that would intrigue folks in this space, you can balance that out by inviting like-minded colleagues who would likely have the types of questions you would like to see asked on this site.

Just a tip from your friendly neighborhood Community Manager.

Source Link

You're doing fine; I'm not seeing any widespread problems.

Unless someone wants claim otherwise, I would try to avoid broad, hypothetical policy discussions unless something very specific becomes a problem in actual practice.

The goal is to create a diverse, comprehensive site. This site is barely one day old. You can't "policy" a site into expertise. If you aren't seeing the types of questions that would intrigue folks in this space, you can balance out that by inviting like-minded colleagues who would likely have the types of questions you would like to see asked on this site.

Just a tip from your friendly neighborhood Community Manager.